Variables of Innovation Web Evolution Speed - Agility
The speed with which ideas evolve through the innovation web archetypes depends upon 12 (twelve) interdependent variables: Resilience, Reciprocity, Agility, Value Creation, Perceived Value, Asset Impact, Cost Benefit, Sequence, Structural Integrity (Density), Structural Dependency (Centrality), Number of Participants and Stability. These variables are explored in a series of blog postings and will be completed by the presentation of a parametric model describing their interdependencies and permitting the simulation and analysis of the overall innovation web evolution process, including the impact of relevant “interventions” needed to accelerate the idea across the diffusion of innovation curve.
This posting explores the variable “Agility”. Agility is an important indicator of a network’s ability to respond to changing external conditions. It is also an indicator of how easy it is for any participant to reach that participant who might be able to solve a specific problem. The calculation of agility is based on the concept of “degrees of separation.” Degrees of separation, technically also referred to as “distance” in a network is a measure of how quickly information can spread out across the network to reach all members. A high average distance between roles or Participants can be an indication that there are not enough hubs or connectors in the network.
The optimal agility will hereby differ for each innovation web archetype, although the principle counts that the lower the agility score the better (i.e. the lower the score the smaller the degrees of separation). Upon achieving minimum agility (along with all other performance indicators) the innovation web is ready for transitioning to the next archetype. The transition threshold value for minimum agility is equal to being “below average” in comparison to a group of at least 13 comparative innovation webs in a similar context (for all performance indicators simultaneously) in order to permit the robust application of parametric assessment techniques for analysis. Whether or not this transition threshold has truly been achieved is also a qualitative judgement and thus requires validation and confirmation by all participants before commencing the transition process to the next archetype.
The image is drawn from https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/04/09/did-something-kill-a-hummingbird-as-it-ate-at-a-feeder/ and is intended to illustrate how some living systems have perfected the art of “stabilizing” their interactions with others.
The symbol used for resilience is “−” to illustrate the “shortest path” nature of this perspective.
The foundation for the analysis of agility is a list of all transactions including their direction and information on whether these are tangible or intangible as shown in the following table.
Table: Innovation Web Archetype Transactions
Archetype
|
Sequence
|
Deliverable
|
Nature
|
From
|
To
|
Research Web
|
1
|
Curiosity
|
Intangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
User(s)
|
Research Web
|
2
|
Problem
|
Tangible
|
User(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Research Web
|
3
|
Idea
|
Intangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
User(s)
|
Research Web
|
4
|
Feedback
|
Intangible
|
User(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Research Web
|
5
|
Product
|
Tangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
User(s)
|
Research Web
|
5
|
Guidance
|
Intangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
User(s)
|
Research Web
|
6
|
Feedback
|
Intangible
|
User(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Research Web
|
6
|
Experience
|
Intangible
|
User(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Research Web
|
6
|
Trust
|
Intangible
|
User(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Research Web
|
7
|
Trust
|
Intangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
User(s)
|
Research Web
|
7
|
Upgrades
|
Tangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
User(s)
|
Research Web
|
8
|
Feedback
|
Intangible
|
User(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Research Web
|
8
|
Experience
|
Intangible
|
User(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Research Web
|
8
|
Trust
|
Intangible
|
User(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
1
|
Stories
|
Intangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
Marketeer(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
1
|
Stories
|
Intangible
|
User(s)
|
Marketeer(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
1
|
Stories
|
Intangible
|
Marketeer(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
2
|
Feedback
|
Intangible
|
Marketeer(s)
|
User(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
3
|
Feedback
|
Intangible
|
Marketeer(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
4
|
Stories
|
Intangible
|
Marketeer(s)
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
5
|
Idea
|
Intangible
|
Marketeer(s)
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
6
|
Curiosity
|
Intangible
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
7
|
Idea
|
Intangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
7
|
Product
|
Tangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
7
|
Trust
|
Intangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
8
|
Feedback
|
Intangible
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Socialization Web
|
9
|
Structure
|
Tangible
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Market Validation
|
1
|
Value Potential
|
Intangible
|
Marketeer(s)
|
Buyer(s)
|
Market Validation
|
2
|
Curiosity
|
Intangible
|
Buyer(s)
|
User(s)
|
Market Validation
|
3
|
Initial Validation
|
Tangible
|
User(s)
|
Buyer(s)
|
Market Validation
|
3
|
Value Proposition
|
Intangible
|
User(s)
|
Buyer(s)
|
Market Validation
|
4
|
Business Case
|
Tangible
|
Buyer(s)
|
Funder(s)
|
Market Validation
|
4
|
Value Proposition
|
Intangible
|
Buyer(s)
|
Funder(s)
|
Market Validation
|
5
|
Requirements
|
Tangible
|
Funder(s)
|
Commercializer(s)
|
Market Validation
|
5
|
Expectations
|
Intangible
|
Funder(s)
|
Commercializer(s)
|
Market Validation
|
6
|
Agreements
|
Tangible
|
Commercializer(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Market Validation
|
6
|
Guidance
|
Intangible
|
Commercializer(s)
|
Innovator(s)
|
Market Validation
|
7
|
Approval
|
Tangible
|
Innovators(s)
|
Commercializer(s)
|
Market Validation
|
8
|
Agreements
|
Tangible
|
Commercializer(s)
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Market Validation
|
8
|
Guidance
|
Intangible
|
Commercializer(s)
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Market Validation
|
9
|
Compliance
|
Tangible
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Commercializer(s)
|
Market Validation
|
9
|
Compliance
|
Intangible
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Commercializer(s)
|
Market Validation
|
10
|
Approval
|
Tangible
|
Commercializer(s)
|
Product Packager(s)
|
Market Validation
|
11
|
Deployment
|
Tangible
|
Product Packager(s)
|
User(s)
|
Market Validation
|
12
|
Final Validation
|
Tangible
|
User(s)
|
Buyer(s)
|
The calculation of agility (and other indicators) is best performed using social network analysis tools. While there are many analysis methods and tools available for the analysis we use (and recommend) Gephi 0.9.2 (See https://gephi.org/). Gephi is not tailored for analyzing the Value Networks data structure so there is some manual effort involved in data preparation. Lists of the connections between nodes (roles) based on the previous table are used as inputs for the analysis.
As a first step multiple directed edges connecting identical nodes are collapsed by Gephi into a single directed and weighted directional connection. For the innovation web with ALL TRANSACTIONS the number of nodes thus remains unchanged (8) while the number of connections for ALL TRANSACTIONS drops from 45 to 19.
The agility values of the innovation web archetypes are calculated by Gephi and shown in the table below to show (a) the average degree of separation for tangible transactions, (b) the average degree of separation for intangible transactions, and (c) the average degree of separation for all transactions.
The Gephi variable “average path length is used to describe the degree of separation for each innovation web.
Table: Innovation Web Archetype Agility
Archetype
|
Agility Tangible
|
Agility Intangible
|
Agility All
|
Research
|
1.333
|
1.333
|
1.333
|
Socialization
|
1.333
|
1.364
|
1.364
|
Market Validation
|
2.452
|
2.174
|
2.405
|
Commercialization
|
< 2.097
|
< 1.562
|
< 1.86
|
If you are interested in learning more please visit us at www.innovation-web.eu, our LinkedIn Group at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/8779542/, our blog at https://open-european-innovation-network.blogspot.com/, our Researchgate project page at https://www.researchgate.net/project/Open-European-Network-for-Enterprise-Innovation-in-High-Value-Manufacturing-ENTOV-HVM and our Facebook page at : https://www.facebook.com/groups/2014779865300180/
Kommentare
Kommentar veröffentlichen